In "The Myth of the Rational Voter," economist Bryan Caplan explores the concept of systematically biased beliefs—ideas that are persistently misaligned with reality and widely held. Caplan argues that these biases significantly influence democratic outcomes because voters act on these misconceptions when casting their ballots, which can lead to suboptimal or counterproductive policy decisions. He identifies several key biases that contribute to this phenomenon.

Anti-market bias
Voters generally distrust the efficacy of markets. Many people underestimate the benefits of market mechanisms and fail to appreciate how the invisible hand can efficiently allocate resources and spur innovation. This bias leads to support for policies that hinder market operations, such as excessive regulation or protectionist trade measures, despite evidence showing that free markets often improve general welfare. 

Anti-foreign bias
Voters frequently harbor misconceptions about international trade and migration, tending to perceive foreign individuals and entities as economic threats, rather than collaborators or complements within a global economy. This bias promotes isolationist policies and trade barriers, which can stifle economic growth and reduce opportunities for mutually beneficial exchanges. 

Make-work bias
This is mistaken belief that employment is an end in itself rather than a means to producing valuable goods and services. People often support policies that create jobs for their own sake, ignoring whether such jobs are productive or necessary. This bias leads to a focus on preserving existing jobs at the expense of economic efficiency and innovation, often resulting in support for subsidies or bailouts for declining industries.

Pessimistic bias
This reflects a pervasive belief that economic conditions are worsening or likely to deteriorate, irrespective of actual trends. It fosters a narrative of decline and crisis, prompting the public to endorse reactionary or interventionist policies designed to "fix" perceived problems that might not exist or that are misunderstood. 

Caplan contends that these biases persist because voters do not face incentives to correct them; individual errors cost nothing at the ballot box, given the low probability that a single vote will determine an election. Consequently, voters have little motivation to educate themselves on complex economic issues or to align their beliefs with empirical data. 

"Systematically biased beliefs" challenge democratic decision-making. Caplan argues that they distort policy priorities and impede the adoption of economically sound decisions. He suggests that experts should have a greater role in policy-making, possibly through insulative measures that protect economic policymaking from direct public influence. Caplan’s work provokes a critical reexamination of democratic ideals, emphasizing the need to address and mitigate the impact of these ingrained biases for more rational and effective governance.

The Citizen's Handbook / Home / Table of Contents
The Citizen's Handbook / Charles Dobson / citizenshandbook.org